Re: [HACKERS] _GNU_SOURCE

2003-10-09 Thread Magnus Enbom
The $Config-stuff is useable from the regular perl binary, 'perl -V:ccflags' for example. -- Magnus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Do we want to try this approach that the DBD:pg guys are using? http://gborg.po

Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?

2002-08-28 Thread Magnus Enbom
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, patch attached. It was actually easier than I thought. We have to > decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4. > > Regression tests pass. No doc updates yet. Thanks alot! I don't mind keeping the old syntax.

Re: [HACKERS] Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch

2002-05-03 Thread Magnus Enbom
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 06:13:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Is that sufficient? The clients probably are not affected by quite as > many config options as the server, but they still have a nontrivial > list. (Multibyte, SSL, Kerberos come to mind at once.) I'd not like > to see us assume tha