At 11:06 PM 3/28/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>Mark Knox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't think this solution would be valid on many other platforms.
>
>Au contraire --- the ARM is the first platform I've heard of that does
>not think sizeof(ItemPointerDat
At 12:27 AM 3/28/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>That would fix it for ARM but not for anyplace else with similar
>alignment behavior. Would you try this patch instead to see what
>happens?
I don't think this solution would be valid on many other platforms. It forces the
structure to not be padded,
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 27 Mar 2001, at 20:49, Mark Knox wrote:
> > > I suspect it might be an alignment problem
> >
> > Sort of. I am suspicious that sizeof(ItemPointerData) is returning
> > 8 rather than 6 as one might expect.
>
> Maybe it&#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 26 Mar 2001, at 23:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Mark Knox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 25 Mar 2001, at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does that database have any user-created relations in it, or is it
> >> just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 25 Mar 2001, at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does that database have any user-created relations in it, or is it
> just a virgin database? It seems that the wrong attlen is being
> computed for ctid fields during bootstrap, but the regression test
> output (if i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 25 Mar 2001, at 15:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> > (rounding on the final digit) and this rather troubling output from
> > type_sanity.
>
> Most bizarre --- and definitely indicative of trouble. Would you send
> along the output of this query in that database:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 22 Mar 2001, at 14:29, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Linux 2.2.x armv4l 7.0 2000-04-17, Mark Knox
Compiled and tested 7.1beta6 tonight. All the regression tests passed
except two - the usual minor differences in geometry (rounding on the
final digit) and t
