Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup --progress output for batch execution

2017-10-01 Thread Martin Marques
Updated patch with documentation of the new option. -- Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services >From ede201ed96d41d799dc3c83dfab1cdcc03e5ced4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Mart=C3=ADn=20Marqu=C3=A9s?=

[HACKERS] pg_basebackup --progress output for batch execution

2017-09-29 Thread Martin Marques
Hi, Some time ago I had to work on a system where I was cloning a standby using pg_basebackup, that didn't have screen or tmux. For that reason I redirected the output to a file and ran it with nohup. I normally (always actually ;) ) run pg_basebackup with --progress and --verbose so I can

Re: [HACKERS] I need Help

2004-05-04 Thread Martin Marques
El Mar 04 May 2004 01:50, Christopher Kings-Lynne escribió: I installed postgresql 7.4 in my computer, I'm using redhat 9.0 . I installed pgadmin III but I can't to conecct to the server. The port 5432 is not open. You need to set tcpip_socket = true in your postgresql.conf. And in

Re: [HACKERS] 7.5 features

2004-04-27 Thread Martin Marques
El Tuesday 27 April 2004 10:27, Bruce Momjian escribió: Here are features that are being worked on, hopefully for 7.5: o tablespaces (Gavin) o nested transactions (Alvaro) o two-phase commit (Heikki Linnakangas) o integrated pg_autovacuum (O'Connor) o PITR

Re: [HACKERS] Remove MySQL Tools from Source?

2004-04-15 Thread Martin Marques
El Mié 14 Abr 2004 22:22, Christopher Kings-Lynne escribió: ... on projects.postgresql.org, or similar.They really aren't doing any good in /contrib. I've already set up a category conversion tools on pgFoundry, and my idea was one project per target system. I reckon that by far

Re: [HACKERS] make == as = ?

2004-04-07 Thread Martin Marques
El Mié 07 Abr 2004 06:28, Fabien COELHO escribió: =? as != is a synonum for , it would make sense. That was never such a terribly good idea, IMHO. Agreed. Compilers should give errors and not try to work around bad code. Is it bad code? Not for people who come from a C/C++/Java

Re: [HACKERS] lib for clients

2004-03-01 Thread Martin Marques
El Lun 01 Mar 2004 11:11, ivan escribió: hi, is there same packets (or sources to compile) only for client-systems ( headers and libs like libpq, and so on) ? On a normal Linux distribution, you would have packages like this: postgresql - PostgreSQL client programs and libraries.

Incremental Backup (Was: [HACKERS] And ppl complain about *our* beta cycles ...)

2004-01-17 Thread Martin Marques
Mensaje citado por David Garamond [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Marc G. Fournier wrote: From the Firebird FAQ: The first beta was released on January 29, 2003. We are hoping to be close to a full release some time around Easter 2003. They are at RC8 right now ... running a *wee* bit behind

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread Martin Marques
Mensaje citado por Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another question, but it is the goal) ... Replication wasn't another BIG one? -- select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread Martin Marques
Mensaje citado por ow [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list) -Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin) -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ] (Christopher) -Have psql \dn show only visible temp

Re: [HACKERS] time format

2004-01-04 Thread Martin Marques
El Sáb 03 Ene 2004 18:20, ivan escribió: ok, bat each time where i want to do select .. a nie tu use to_char, but it should be in function timestamp_out to convert time to string it would be easer and faster. Look deeper into what Christopher said and use casting to get the right output:

Re: [HACKERS] time format

2004-01-04 Thread Martin Marques
Quoting Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Martin Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Look deeper into what Christopher said and use casting to get the right output: prueba= select now()::timestamp(0); There's also current_timestamp(0), which is a more standards-compliant way of doing the same

Re: [HACKERS] Incremental backup

2003-02-14 Thread Martin Marques
On Jue 13 Feb 2003 16:38, Bruce Momjian wrote: Patrick Macdonald wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Someone at Red Hat is working on point-in-time recovery, also known as incremental backups. PITR and incremental backup are different beasts. PITR deals with a backup + logs. Incremental

Re: [HACKERS] Incremental backup

2003-02-14 Thread Martin Marques
On Vie 14 Feb 2003 09:52, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, once we have PITR, will anyone want incremental backups? I will probably not need it, but I know of people how have databases which build dumps of more then 20GB. They are interested in live incremental backups. -- Porqué usar una base de

[HACKERS] Incremental backup

2003-02-07 Thread Martin Marques
How's this issue going on the 7.4 development tree? I saw it on the TODO list, but didn't find much on the archives of this mailing list. -- Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera, si podés usar PostgreSQL? - Martín