Re: [HACKERS] using the same connection?

Well actually this particular connection is just for selects... On Tue, 06 Feb 2001, you wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:08:49AM -0500, Mathieu Dube wrote: > > Hi y'all, > > Is it a bad idea for an app to keep just a couple of connections to a > > database, p

[HACKERS] using the same connection?

nions on that practice... Thanks -Mat -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live www.flipr.com

[HACKERS] Re: Should I look elsewhere??

gt; much nicer to read.. > > -Mitch > > - Original Message - > From: "Mathieu Dube" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 5:03 PM > Subject: Should I look elsewhere?? > > > > So... > >

[HACKERS] Should I look elsewhere??

So... If after recompiling postgres with -g in the CFLAGS and still getting 0x40050768 in ?? () in gdb, should I look elsewhere??? Thanks -Mat -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live

[HACKERS] with -g and libpq.a ...

even after compiling with -g and using the libpq.a it still outputs that on the bt after the crash... (gdb) bt #0 0x40050768 in ?? () #1 0x4004ff25 in ?? () #2 0x804a3cd in main (argc=3, argv=0xb8e4) at therver.c:430 #3 0x400739ee in ?? () -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live

Re: [HACKERS] Re: 1024 limits??

> instead of against the libpq.so that's in /usr/lib (or whereever the > RPMs installed it). > > regards, tom lane -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live www.flipr.com

Re: [HACKERS] Re: 1024 limits??

nal Message ----- > From: "Mathieu Dube" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 11:31 AM > Subject: Re: 1024 limits?? > > > > Im currently using rpms &g

[HACKERS] 1024 limit??

o fix this one for a long time... Thanks -Mat -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live www.flipr.com

[HACKERS] 1024 limit?

o fix this one for a long time... Thanks -Mat -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live www.flipr.com

Re: [HACKERS] Re: 1024 limits??

it. Instead, copy the > static libpq.a library (look in src/interfaces/libpq after building) > to your application directory, and force your app to link against it > instead of against the libpq.so that's in /usr/lib (or whereever the > RPMs installed it). > > regards, tom lane -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live www.flipr.com

Re: [HACKERS] 1024 limits??

Im currently using rpms is there a way to just remove an rpm(the API one) and compile only that?? where can I find libpq sources? my app is already compiled with -g On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, you wrote: > Mathieu Dube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > if I do bt on gdb it say

Re: [HACKERS] 1024 limits??

I just do a select on a user table with the username and password pretty upfront and normal query you would like me to use PQtrace??? it doesnt say much if I do bt on gdb it says: 0x4b3003d in ?? () On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, you wrote: > Mathieu Dube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >

[HACKERS] 1024 limits??

o fix this one for a long time... Thanks -Mat -- Mathieu Dube Mondo-Live www.flipr.com