On 2017-02-24 07:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't think it's only Oracle that allows omitting the
> alias; I think there are a number of other systems that behave
> similarly.
SQLite, for example.
Making conversions from SQLite to Postgres easier is a Good Thing.
"subquery in FROM must have an
On 2014-10-10 19:44, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
People keep remarking that they don't like that you can (optionally)
name a unique index explicitly,
[...]
To restate: to do so is conflating the logical definition of the
database with a particular
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
So I took a look at the patch eelog-2012-05-09.diff today. All of the
following remarks apply to it alone.
I've been trying out this patch for my own interest (I'm very pleased to
see work on this feature), and I have a couple of suggestions from a
On 2011-04-22 21:55, Greg Smith wrote:
On 04/22/2011 09:32 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
OK, that's good, but ISTM we still have a hole during
RemoveOldXlogFiles() where we don't fsync or open/close the file, just
rename it.
This is also something that many applications rely upon working as hoped
