Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage "port based"?

2006-05-09 Thread Max Khon
Hi! On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:56:13PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > >>This is why it's disabled by default, and the jail documentation > >>specifically advises of this possibility. Excerpt below. > > > >Ah, I see, glad to see it's accurately documented. > > As it has been for the last five ye

Re: [HACKERS] RI oddness

2001-04-24 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Jan Wieck wrote: > I just got trapped by one of my own features in the > referential integrity area. > > The problem is, that the trigger run on the FK row at UPDATE > allways checks and locks the referenced PK, even if the FK >

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in FOREIGN KEY

2001-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > This problem with foreign keys has been reported to me, and I have confirmed > > the bug exists in current sources. The DELETE should succeed: > > > > --- > > >

[HACKERS] locking bug?

2000-12-16 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! test=> create table foo(id int primary key); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'foo_pkey' for table 'foo' CREATE test=> insert into foo values(1); INSERT 88959 1 test=> create table bar(id int references foo); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigge

[HACKERS] left join bug? (fwd)

2000-12-13 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! test=# create table a(id int primary key); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'a_pkey' for table 'a' CREATE test=# create table b(id int references a); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY check(s) CREATE test=# insert into a v

[HACKERS] left join bug?

2000-12-13 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! test=# create table a(id int primary key); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'a_pkey' for table 'a' CREATE test=# create table b(id int references a); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY check(s) CREATE test=# insert into a v