On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> Could you share the performance numbers? I'm really concerned about
> the performance overhead caused by this patch.
>
I've tried pgbench in select mode with small data sets to avoid disk
io and didn't see any difference. That was on my old c
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Please reply to the original thread in future (even if the Reply-to
> Message-ID is the same, I see this as a separate thread).
>
sorry about that, when i added "review" to the subject gmail removed
the thread info.
for reference the origi
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> It seemed neater to me to create a new flag, so that in principle any
>> vacuum() code path can request autovacuum_work_mem, rather than having
>> lazyvacuum.c code call IsAutoVac
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Many distros are switching/switched to systemd. In the git repo, we only
> have init script for SysV. Would it make sense to add systemd service
> script to our tarball as well? This could also standardize the systemd
> scripts use
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
>
>
> The most interesting thing that I could see calculating from these stats
> would require also knowing how much time was spent waiting on writes and
> reads on the network. With the cumulative time spent as well as the count of
> syscalls you
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Nigel Heron wrote:
>>
>> So, for now, the counters only track sockets created from an inbound
>> (client to server) connection.
>
> here's v3 of the patch (rebase and cleanup).
>
Hi,
here's v4 of the patch. I added docum
>
> So, for now, the counters only track sockets created from an inbound
> (client to server) connection.
here's v3 of the patch (rebase and cleanup).
-nigel.
*** a/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql
--- b/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql
***
*** 586,592 CREATE VIEW pg_stat
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Nigel Heron wrote:
> Hi, thanks, I'm still actively working on this patch. I've gotten the
> traffic counters working when using SSL enabled clients (includes the
> ssl overhead now) but I still have the walsender transfers under SSL
> to w
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Mike Blackwell
> wrote:
>> Sounds good. I personally don't have any interest in log file i/o counters,
>> but that's just me. I wonder if stats collector counters might be useful...
>> I seem to recall an e
__
> Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout Management
> | RR Donnelley
> 1750 Wallace Ave | St Charles, IL 60174-3401
> Office: 630.313.7818
> mike.blackw...@rrd.com
> http://www.rrdonnelley.com
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013
Hi, I've been using postgres for many years but never took the time to play
with the code until now. As a learning experience i came up with this WIP
patch to keep track of the # of bytes sent and received by the server over
it's communication sockets. Counters are kept per database, per connection
11 matches
Mail list logo
