[HACKERS] port report: Linux powerpc

Hello, with ./configure --prefix=/tmp --enable-thread-safety --with-tcl --with-perl --with-python --with-krb5 --with-pam -with-openssl == All 96 tests passed. == Linux bruckner 2.4.25 #1 Wed Feb 25 10:32:54 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux postgresql-8.0.0rc1 buil

[HACKERS] port report: Linux sparc

Hello, == All 96 tests passed. == $ uname -a Linux vore 2.4.26 #1 SMP Tue Apr 20 14:16:21 EDT 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux postgresql-8.0.0rc1 build on Debian GNU/Linux sid. -- NoÃl KÃthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Dies ist

[HACKERS] port report: Linux m68k

Hello, == All 96 tests passed. == $ uname -a Linux crest 2.4.26-amiga #1 Thu Apr 22 00:21:18 CEST 2004 m68k GNU/Linux postgresql-8.0.0rc1 build on Debian GNU/Linux sid. -- NoÃl KÃthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Dies is

[HACKERS] port report: Linux amd64/x86_64

Hello, == All 96 tests passed. == $ uname -a Linux pergolesi 2.4.26 #1 SMP Mon May 24 11:59:02 CEST 2004 x86_64 GNU/Linux postgresql-8.0.0rc1 build on Debian GNU/Linux sid. Sadly tcl and pam devel files weren't installed so I could just use (I'm not root

[HACKERS] port report: Linux parisc64 / hppa

Hello, == All 96 tests passed. == $ uname -a Linux paer 2.4.26-64-smp #1 SMP Thu Apr 29 04:59:03 UTC 2004 parisc64 GNU/Linux postgresql-8.0.0rc1 build on Debian GNU/Linux sid. -- NoÃl KÃthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description:

opteron port [was: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports]

Am So, den 26.10.2003 schrieb Bruce Momjian um 02:38: > > All 93 tests passed. ... > > Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux > > > > It says i686 but its AMD Opteron: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pgsql$ cat /proc/cpuinfo |more ... > > model name : AMD Op

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

a minor thing. The version of s/390 should be 7.4 and not 7.3. (maybe the same with OpenBSD/x86?) -- Noèl Köthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17: > reports of these slower systems will follow but they need a bit more time: > Linux crest 2.4.20 #1 Wed Mar 5 01:39:17 EST 2003 m68k unknown Peter gave me this patch for m68k: -- src/include/port/linux.h.orig Sat Oct 25 13:45:4

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

systems will follow but they need a bit more time: Linux casals 2.4.19-r4k-ip22 #1 Tue Mar 18 15:38:10 CET 2003 mips unknown Linux crest 2.4.20 #1 Wed Mar 5 01:39:17 EST 2003 m68k unknown Linux escher 2.4.22 #2 Sat Sep 6 18:23:54 CEST 2003 alpha GNU/Linux -- Noèl Köthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

32 bit mode ... Is it compiled for the i386 or > the x86_64 arch? Did you have CONFIG_X86_64=y as compile time > option? Yes, you are right. Its "only" 32bit (kernel and userland). The Debian amd64 port team is still working on 64bit packages. -- Noèl Köthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17: > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > > > The current list is at: > > > > http://candl

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17: > reports of these slower systems will follow but they need a bit more time: > > Linux casals 2.4.19-r4k-ip22 #1 Tue Mar 18 15:38:10 CET 2003 mips unknown polymorphism ... ok stats... ok ==

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

systems will follow but they need a bit more time: Linux casals 2.4.19-r4k-ip22 #1 Tue Mar 18 15:38:10 CET 2003 mips unknown Linux crest 2.4.20 #1 Wed Mar 5 01:39:17 EST 2003 m68k unknown Linux escher 2.4.22 #2 Sat Sep 6 18:23:54 CEST 2003 alpha GNU/Linux -- Noèl Köthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil