Re: [HACKERS] MVCC overheads

2016-07-08 Thread Pete Stevenson
some analysis along these lines, but I’m looking for an independent result that confirms (or not) his work. Thank you, Pete Stevenson > On Jul 7, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2016 at 20:50, Pete Stevenson <etep.n

Re: [HACKERS] MVCC overheads

2016-07-07 Thread Pete Stevenson
that can use MVCC. It should be possible to figure out how much work goes into maintaining that property. Thank you, Pete On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 7 July 2016 at 17:45, Pete Stevenson <etep.nosnev...@gmail.com> wrote: > >&g

[HACKERS] MVCC overheads

2016-07-07 Thread Pete Stevenson
, the overhead of version checking and version creation, and of garbage collecting old and unnecessary versions? For what it’s worth, I am working on a research project where it is envisioned that some of this work can be offloaded. Thank you, Pete Stevenson -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing