On Wednesday 2. of March 2011 20:18:08 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-03-02 at 09:10 +0100, Rumko wrote:
> > What about this patch (
> > http://www.rumko.net/0001-DragonFly-BSD-support-linked-nbsd.patch )?
> > instead of linking to freebsd, it's linked to netbsd
On Tuesday 1. of March 2011 23:05:17 Rumko wrote:
> On Tuesday 1. of March 2011 22:44:16 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tis, 2011-03-01 at 22:22 +0100, Rumko wrote:
> > > Well, wouldn't consider it ugly, but the patch (attached and available
> > > at http://www.rumk
On Tuesday 1. of March 2011 22:44:16 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-03-01 at 22:22 +0100, Rumko wrote:
> > Well, wouldn't consider it ugly, but the patch (attached and available at
> > http://www.rumko.net/0001-DragonFly-BSD-support-linked.patch ) is a lot
>
On Tuesday 1. of March 2011 16:07:47 Tom Lane wrote:
> Rumko writes:
> > On Sunday 27. of February 2011 23:50:17 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> It seems to me that it would be easier to just map dragonfly to the
> >> freebsd template.
> >
> > I didn't se
On Sunday 27. of February 2011 23:50:17 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2011-02-27 at 21:19 +0100, Rumko wrote:
> > The attached patch (also available at
> > http://www.rumko.net/0001-DragonFly-BSD-support.patch ) applies cleanly
> > to the master branch and can be cherry-pi
//www.netbsd.org/support/query-pr.html gnats
database).
--
Regards,
Rumko
0001-DragonFly-BSD-support.patch
Description: application/mbox
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
