fer cache issue you
guys have been discussing, but I haven't read all the email exchange
on the subject.
Thanks,
Sherry
--
Sherry Moore, Solaris Kernel Developmenthttp://blogs.sun.com/sherrym
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions
e Sherry can comment on the question whether it's possible
> for a large-scale-memcpy to not take a hit on filling a cache line
> that wasn't previously in cache?
>
> I looked a bit at the Linux code that's being used here, but it's all
> x86_64 assembler whic
- Forwarded message from Sherry Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:34:19 -0800
From: Sherry Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
128K256K512K1M 2M 128M
Seconds 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.1
Sherry
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:41:14PM -0800, Sherry Moore wrote:
> - Forwarded mess
> With copyout_max_cached being 8K:
^^^
4K
> Working
> set 16K 32K 64K 128K256K512K1M 2M 128M
>
> Seconds 4.8
