Thank you very much for refining patch.
I thought there is no missing part.
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 20:45, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
2) use appropriate macro and datatypes for Windows API.
enables more than 32bits shared
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
2009/12/4 Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp:
Thanks to suggestion.
I send pathces again by another mailer for the archive.
Sorry to waste resources, below is same content that I send before.
I have a couple of comments about
Thanks to suggestion.
I send pathces again by another mailer for the archive.
Sorry to waste resources, below is same content that I send before.
Tsutomu Yamada
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
#
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Hello.
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support Windows LLP64)
almost the same as that post before
(qdesc-qname), %p, qdesc);
qdesc-nargs = argc;
qdesc-argtypes = (Oid *) malloc(argc * sizeof(Oid));
qdesc-arginfuncs = (FmgrInfo *) malloc(argc * sizeof(FmgrInfo));
--
Tsutomu Yamada
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
From b6e51007eb3bfb9dd4333dfa1bfd479a049d70f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Peter Eisentrautpete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009 12:07:24 Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
Included is a conceptual patch to use intptr_t. Comments are welcome.
After closer inspection, not having a win64 box
incorrect address %p,
expected %p,
+ address, UsedShmemSegAddr);
+ VirtualFree(address, 0, MEM_RELEASE);
VirtualFreeEx(hChild, address, 0, MEM_RELEASE);
+ return false;
+ }
Regards,
--
Tsutomu Yamada
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
--
Sent via
Hello,
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
reattach to shared memory.
Can this be added to CommitFest ?
Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I
is deleted.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-07/msg00078.php
Regards,
--
Tsutomu Yamada
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
Index: src/backend/port/win32_shmem.c
===
RCS file: /mnt/prj/pg/cvsmirror/pg/pgsql/src/backend/port/win32_shmem.c,v
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009 12:07:24 Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Short description:
Current PostgreSQL implementation has some portability issues to
support 64bit platforms: pointer calculations
need to add something like below to
include/port/*.h.
/* LP64, IPL64, ILP32, LP32 */
typedef long intptr_t;
typedef unsigned long uintptr_t;
/* LLP64 */
typedef long long intptr_t;
typedef unsigned long long uintptr_t;
Thanks,
--
Tsutomu Yamada // tsut...@sraoss.co.jp
SRA
to test ?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-08/msg01592.php
Thanks.
--
Tsutomu Yamada
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
13 matches
Mail list logo
