Thank you, we figured out that, the query with lower() is taking too long
and we thought it is having some problem. The actual table in our database
has more than 10 million rows and query is taking too long.
Thanks
Yuva
-Original Message-
From: Yuva Chandolu
Sent: Friday, August 09
Hi, We have a problem with lower() function working differently for two
different data types
table: yuva_test
column_name data_type
yt_name1varchar(255)
yt_name2char(1)
The data is
yt_name1yt_name2
yuvaF
bharat F
1234556 F
234 F
etc.
Hi,
We had seen the following exception when we tried for a heavy query(around
1 to 2 in result is possible)
An I/O error occured while reading from backend - Exception:
java.net.SocketException: socket closed: Bad file number
Stack Trace:
java.net.SocketException: socket closed: Bad fi
This is great, we thought we may go for code changes, we will go with this
solution instead.
Thanks
Yuva
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:31 PM
To: Yuva Chandolu
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:15 PM
To: Yuva Chandolu
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Outer join differences
Yuva Chandolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see different results in Oracle and postgres
Hi,
I see different results in Oracle and postgres for same outer join queries.
Here are the details.
I have the following tables in our pg db
table: yuva_test1
yt1_id yt1_nameyt1_descr
1 1-name1 1-desc1
2 1-name2 1-desc2
3 1-name3 1-de
Message-
From: Marc Lavergne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Yuva Chandolu
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] outer join help...
Looks fine, you may want to rephrase it as:
select yt1_name, yt1_descr, yt2_name, yt2_descr, yt3_name,
we try with live data.
Thanks
Yuva
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Yuva Chandolu
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] outer join help...
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:07:43PM -0700, Yuva Chandolu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I n
Hi,
We have a query "select count(count(*)) from test group by
trunc(test_date)". This works fine with Oracle but when moving to postgres I
changed it to "select count(count(*)) from test group by date_trunc('day',
test_date)" but I get the following error
ERROR: Aggregate function calls may no
Hi,
We are in the process of moving to Postgres from Oracle. We were using
"savepoint xyz" and "rollback to savepoint xyz" with Oracle. Or these
supported by Postgres?, if so what are the equivalent queries in postgres
for the same.
Thanks
Yuva
Sr. Java Developer
www.ebates.com
Hi,
We are moving to postgres from Oarcle. When we were with Oracle, we were
using a total of 160 connections(4 app servers each maintaining a pool of 40
connections). After moving to postgres we want to make it higher i.e make it
60 connections for each app server i.e a total of 240 connections.
Hi,
We observed a "String index out of range: 23" problem when we tried to
retrieve timestamp field value that has milliseconds. We are trying to find
a quick fix for the millisecond problem for Timestamp.
We notice there is a beta driver(devpgjdbc2.jar) that contains this fix
currently, but wa
Hi,
We have a timestamp column in one table and we are getting the above problem
when the timestamp column has a value up to milliseconds.
We are using stable PostgreSQL 7.2 jdbc driver (pgjdbc2.jar) got from
http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html. Does anyone know of latest
production ready d
Hi,
We have a timestamp column in one table and we are getting the above problem
when the timestamp column has a value upto milliseconds.
We are using PostgreSQL 7.2 version stable jdbc driver(pgjdbc2.jar) got from
http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html. Does anyone know of latest
production r
Hi,
We are moving to Postgres from Oracle. We have a few tables that have around
8 to 10 millions of rows and their size increases very rapidly(deletions are
very less on these tables). How will Postgres hanlde very big tables like
this? or would it be very slow when compared to Oracle? Do you ha
15 matches
Mail list logo