--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first one is really not related to the others --- it just proposes
> that when renaming a table or individual column, we should look for
> sequences "owned by" that column or columns, and rename them so that
> they still look like "table_column_seq".
Oops: meant pg_type.typname
and
pg_class.relname.
- Original Message
From: craigp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2008 2:36:33 AM
Subject: newbie: renaming sequences task
Hi
-
I
was
perusing
the
todo
list
to
see
some
easy
Oops: meant pg_type.typname
and
pg_class.relname.
- Original Message
From: craigp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2008 2:36:33 AM
Subject: newbie: renaming sequences task
Hi
-
I
was
perusing
the
todo
list
to
see
some
easy
Hi -
I was perusing the todo list to see some easy items that I might help out on
(and get up to speed on postgres hacking)... one of them (with %) seems to lead
to another:
o %Have ALTER TABLE RENAME rename SERIAL sequence names
o Have ALTER SEQUENCE RENAME rename the sequence name
I'm having trouble compiling the current cvs version on windows xp (msvc 2005
express). Compile errors below.
I have bison 1.875 (I can't find 2.2+ for windows) and flex 2.5.4. These tools
seem to generate correct outputs.
It looks like it might be including parse.h from include/parser/parse.h
Hi -
I've searched the email archives, and the last I saw INSERT ... RETURNING
referenced was last March. I had two questions:
1) will this feature make it in 8.2?
2) is there a timeline for 8.2?
BTW, while searching for "insert returning", I noticed an invalid hit (the url
goes to a different m
