hi NikhilS.
2008/3/14, NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Longlong,
>
>
> > > i think this is a better idea.
> > from *NikhilS *
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-12/msg00584.php
> > But instead of using a per insert or a batch i
2008/3/12, Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I don't see why creating index entries in bulk has anything to do with
> COPY vs. INSERT: if a lot of rows are being loaded into the table in a
> single command, it would be a win to create the index entries in bulk,
> regardless of whether COPY or IN
-- Forwarded message --
From: longlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008-3-12 9:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS]COPY issue(gsoc project)
To: Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the first feature has been implementet. i used to ignore the pid column with
the command "copy t
i want to paticipate in gsoc 2008.
here is my plan:
the red part is came from Greg Smith(thanks for Greg Smith's advice).
1.release8.2 make COPY TO can copy the output of an arbitrary SELECT
statement. so i think maybe COPY FROM can get data from output and 'insert
into' some column that designat
