On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Simon Riggs wrote:
> We don't need to mention timelines in the docs, nor do we need to alter
> pg_controldata to display it...just a comment in the code to explain why
> we add a large number to the LogId after each recovery completes.
I'd disagree on that. Knowing what exactl
Hi,
while playing around with the tablespace stuff I noticed that on can't see
the tablespace a table is in when querying the pg_tables view.
I think the tablespace a table is in is a valuable information and should
be shown there. This also applies to any ohter related view (like
pg_indexes etc.
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> > Should we use a different datatype than time_t for the commit timestamp,
> > one that offers more fine grained differentiation between checkpoints?
>
> Imho seconds is really sufficient. If you know a more precise position
> you will probabl
