On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 June 2012 04:21, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
As a side note unrelated to this patch, I also dislike how function
On 18 June 2012 04:21, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for the idea. I find the existing behavior rather confusing,
particularly the fact that a schema-qualified function name will be
tab-completed, i.e. this works.
DROP FUNCTION my_schema.myTAB
but then, as your second
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2012 04:21, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
As a side note unrelated to this patch, I also dislike how function
name tab-completions will not fill in the opening parenthesis, which
makes for
[Hope it's OK if I move this thread to -hackers, as part of CF review.]
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed this while testing 9.2, but it seems to go back to at least
8.3. Tab completion of function arguments doesn't work if the function
