On 30 July 2015 at 01:35, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2015 02:21 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
While going through this, I spotted another issue --- in a DML
query with additional non-target relations, such as UPDATE t1 ..
FROM t2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2015 06:52 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 01:35, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
On 06/01/2015 02:21 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
While going through this, I spotted another issue --- in a DML
query with additional non-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2015 02:21 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
While going through this, I spotted another issue --- in a DML
query with additional non-target relations, such as UPDATE t1 ..
FROM t2 .., the old code was checking the UPDATE policies of both
t1 and
On 28 May 2015 at 08:51, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
Actually I think a new boolean field is unnecessary, and probably the
policy_id field is too. Re-reading the code in rowsecurity.c, I think
it could use a bit of refactoring.
On 27 May 2015 at 14:51, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 02:42, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Now, looking at the code, I'm actually failing to see a case where we
use the RowSecurityPolicy-policy_name.. Perhaps *that's* what we
should be looking to
Dean,
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 14:51, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 02:42, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Now, looking at the code, I'm actually failing to see a case where we
use the
Dean,
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 02:42, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Now, looking at the code, I'm actually failing to see a case where we
use the RowSecurityPolicy-policy_name.. Perhaps *that's* what we
should be looking to remove?
If
Alvaro,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
What do we need RowSecurityPolicy-policy_id for? It seems to me that
it is only used to determine whether the policy is the default deny
one, so that it
Alvaro,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
What do we need RowSecurityPolicy-policy_id for? It seems to me that
it is only used to determine whether the policy is the default deny
one, so that it can later be removed if a hook adds a different one.
This seems contrived as
Stephen Frost wrote:
Alvaro,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
What do we need RowSecurityPolicy-policy_id for? It seems to me that
it is only used to determine whether the policy is the default deny
one, so that it can later be removed if a hook adds a different one.
Stephen Frost wrote:
Row-Level Security Policies (RLS)
What do we need RowSecurityPolicy-policy_id for? It seems to me that
it is only used to determine whether the policy is the default deny
one, so that it can later be removed if a hook adds a different one.
This seems contrived as well as
11 matches
Mail list logo
