Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> One possible real solution would be to tweak the dictionary APIs so
>> that the dictionaries can find out whether this is the first load during
>> a session, or a reload, and emit notices only in the first case.
> Yea, that would work
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> That's not fixing the problem, unless your proposal includes never
> >> issuing any warnings at all, for anything.
>
> > No warning for "*" because it is intentional, but warning for actual
> > stop words.
>
> No
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's not fixing the problem, unless your proposal includes never
>> issuing any warnings at all, for anything.
> No warning for "*" because it is intentional, but warning for actual
> stop words.
No, you're focusing on one symptom n
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just talked to Teodor and we discussed this problem. My idea is to
> > have a special marker in the synonym table, perhaps "*" to indicate the
> > presence of _any_ stop word at that location. This will not produce any
> > warnings
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just talked to Teodor and we discussed this problem. My idea is to
> have a special marker in the synonym table, perhaps "*" to indicate the
> presence of _any_ stop word at that location. This will not produce any
> warnings because it is clearly int
