Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-06-01 Thread Noah Misch
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:09:16PM -0400, David Steele wrote: > On 5/31/15 11:49 AM, Noah Misch wrote: > > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:51:04PM -0400, David Steele wrote: > >> Sure - I can write code to do that. But then why release a beta at all? > > > > It's largely for the benefit of folks plann

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-06-01 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I think we should postpone next week's release. > I'm a bit split on this. > We *definitely* don't want to release the multixact fix without it being > carefully reviewed, that's the part I'm not split about :) And

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-05-31 Thread David Steele
On 5/31/15 11:49 AM, Noah Misch wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:51:04PM -0400, David Steele wrote: >> On 5/30/15 8:38 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> On 05/30/2015 03:48 PM, David Steele wrote: I would argue Heikki's WAL stuff is a perfect case for releasing a public alpha/beta soon.

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-05-31 Thread Noah Misch
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:51:04PM -0400, David Steele wrote: > On 5/30/15 8:38 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 05/30/2015 03:48 PM, David Steele wrote: > >> I would argue Heikki's WAL stuff is a perfect case for releasing a > >> public alpha/beta soon. I'd love to test PgBackRest with an "offic

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-05-29 Thread Noah Misch
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:01:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost writes: > > * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > >> I am unclear if we are anywhere near ready for beta1 even in June. Are > >> we? > > > I'm all about having that discussion... but can we do it on another > > thre

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-05-29 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 05/29/2015 12:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Do you have any feeling of how likely people are to actually hit the multixact one? I've followed some of that impressive debugging you guys did, and I know it's a pretty critical bug if you hit

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-05-29 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Do you have any feeling of how likely people are to actually hit the > multixact one? I've followed some of that impressive debugging you guys did, > and I know it's a pretty critical bug if you hit it, but how wide-spread > will it be? Th

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] postpone next week's release

2015-05-29 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should postpone next week's release. I have been hard at > work on the multixact-related bugs that were reported in 9.4.2 and > 9.3.7, and the subsequent bugs found by code-reading, but getting them > all fixed by Monday do