Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Cast your vote ...

2003-01-02 Thread Dan Langille
On 2 Jan 2003 at 21:30, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote: > > Coincidentally, I've just started up a voting script project... see > > http://polls.unixathome.org/ > > Does it support hanging chads? Now is the time to decide that -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Cast your vote ...

2003-01-02 Thread Jeroen T. Vermeulen
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:07:48PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > > else to do the same. In the big picture, marketing statements like > > this survey mean alot more than most technical folks want to > > acknowledge. The figures would be a lot more interesting anyway if people bothered to cor

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Cast your vote ...

2003-01-02 Thread Dan Langille
On 2 Jan 2003 at 7:53, Charles H. Woloszynski wrote: > Yeah, the registration was painless and enough options to disable it > annoying you. Count my vote cast for PostgreSQL. I encourage everyone > else to do the same. In the big picture, marketing statements like > this survey mean alot more th

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Cast your vote ...

2003-01-02 Thread Charles H. Woloszynski
Yeah, the registration was painless and enough options to disable it annoying you. Count my vote cast for PostgreSQL. I encourage everyone else to do the same. In the big picture, marketing statements like this survey mean alot more than most technical folks want to acknowledge. Please vote

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Cast your vote ...

2003-01-02 Thread Peter Childs
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Just got this in my mailbox: > > 2002 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards: > > >http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=78a8c06fbc1dcecd52597decd6c56ad8&threadid=39870 > > And we are way behind MySQL (like, d'ah!): > > >h