Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effective value "off" when the huge page is unavailable?

Fujii Masao writes: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> If the proposal is to have SHOW report something other than the setting >> of the variable, that's not a great plan either. It's generally important >> that the output of SHOW be

Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effective value "off" when the huge page is unavailable?

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Fujii Masao writes: >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki >> wrote: >>> I don't have a strong opinion on that, but I think a bit that it would be >>>

Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effective value "off" when the huge page is unavailable?

Fujii Masao writes: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > wrote: >> I don't have a strong opinion on that, but I think a bit that it would be >> better to reflect the effective setting, i.e. SHOW displays huge_pages as >>

Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effective value "off" when the huge page is unavailable?

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > Hello, all > > Could you give me your opinions on whether the SHOW command should display > the effective value or the specified value for huge_pages? During the review > of "Supporting huge_pages on

[HACKERS] [RFC] Should "SHOW huge_pages" display the effective value "off" when the huge page is unavailable?

Hello, all Could you give me your opinions on whether the SHOW command should display the effective value or the specified value for huge_pages? During the review of "Supporting huge_pages on Windows", which is now shifted to CommitFest 2017-3, Magnus gave me a comment that the huge_page