=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_B=F6hm?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am 03.11.2008 um 12:06 schrieb Richard Huxton:
It's not possible to have a LOCK statement outside of a
transaction. It's just not meaningful to have a transaction that only
has a LOCK statement in it.
as postgres does not warn you
That's a good point. We throw error for DECLARE CURSOR outside a
transaction block, since it's obviously a mistake. I wonder whether
we shouldn't equally throw error for LOCK outside a transaction block.
I can sort of imagine some corner cases where
lock-and-immediately-release would be
Robert Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's a good point. We throw error for DECLARE CURSOR outside a
transaction block, since it's obviously a mistake. I wonder whether
we shouldn't equally throw error for LOCK outside a transaction block.
Objections anyone?
No, I've been bitten by
