Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-10-10 Thread Kohei KaiGai
2012/10/10 Alvaro Herrera : > Kohei KaiGai wrote: >> 2012/9/5 Andrew Dunstan : > >> > Looking at SEPgsql testing is on my long TODO list. I'll have to set up a >> > separate VM for it, as I don't habitually run SELinux. >> > >> If you are available to provide a VM environment for sepgsql, let me he

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-10-10 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Kohei KaiGai wrote: > 2012/10/10 Alvaro Herrera : > > Kohei KaiGai wrote: > >> 2012/9/5 Andrew Dunstan : > > > >> > Looking at SEPgsql testing is on my long TODO list. I'll have to set up a > >> > separate VM for it, as I don't habitually run SELinux. > >> > > >> If you are available to provide a V

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-10-10 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Kohei KaiGai wrote: > 2012/9/5 Andrew Dunstan : > > Looking at SEPgsql testing is on my long TODO list. I'll have to set up a > > separate VM for it, as I don't habitually run SELinux. > > > If you are available to provide a VM environment for sepgsql, let me help > set up its build and regression

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-05 Thread Kohei KaiGai
2012/9/5 Robert Haas : > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: >> This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest >> core API changes. >> >> 1) Even though the prototype of ProcessUtility_hook was recently changed, >> sepgsql side didn't follow this update,

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-05 Thread Kohei KaiGai
2012/9/5 Andrew Dunstan : > > On 09/05/2012 09:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of mié sep 05 08:30:37 -0300 2012: >>> >>> 2012/9/3 Alvaro Herrera : Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012: > > This patch fixes

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: > This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest > core API changes. > > 1) Even though the prototype of ProcessUtility_hook was recently changed, > sepgsql side didn't follow this update, so it made build failed. > > 2

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-05 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/05/2012 09:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of mié sep 05 08:30:37 -0300 2012: 2012/9/3 Alvaro Herrera : Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012: This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest cor

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of mié sep 05 08:30:37 -0300 2012: > 2012/9/3 Alvaro Herrera : > > Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012: > >> This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest > >> core API changes. > > > > I think you s

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-05 Thread Kohei KaiGai
2012/9/3 Alvaro Herrera : > Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012: >> This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest >> core API changes. > > I think you should get a buildfarm animal installed that builds and > tests sepgsql, to avoid thi

Re: [HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012: > This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest > core API changes. I think you should get a buildfarm animal installed that builds and tests sepgsql, to avoid this kind of problem in the future. -

[HACKERS] [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

2012-09-02 Thread Kohei KaiGai
This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes. 1) Even though the prototype of ProcessUtility_hook was recently changed, sepgsql side didn't follow this update, so it made build failed. 2) sepgsql internally uses GETSTRUCT() and HeapTupleGetOid() macro