Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-13 Thread Kevin Brown
Bruce Momjian wrote: FWIW, I've seen several apps that use .txt for config files, but I can't think of an example right now. Most don't though - .cfg or .conf is probably most common. Except for the majority of windows programs that don't use config files - they use the registry. But I

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-10 Thread Magnus Hagander
Where are we on this? I think Andrew and I both think *.txt is confusing. We need to decide on Monday if we should change the current *.txt names. We can either leave it unchanged, remove *.txt, or change it to *.config. APPDATA/postgresql/pgpass.txt

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-10 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Personally, I don't really care :-) My point was that .pgpass is bad. pgpass or pgpass.conf or pgpass.txt are all fine by me. I agree that .conf might be more logical than .txt. I think the analogy to .conf is bogus. The existing files named .conf are

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Personally, I don't really care :-) My point was that .pgpass is bad. pgpass or pgpass.conf or pgpass.txt are all fine by me. I agree that .conf might be more logical than .txt. I think the analogy to .conf is bogus. The existing

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: At this point, Andrew, Magnus, and I who deal with Win32 regularly all feel *.conf is more logical than *.txt. I have not heard anyone say *.txt is better except Tom. Is that enough of a vote? AFAIR they both said they didn't care; you are the only

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-10 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Bruce Momjian wrote: At this point, Andrew, Magnus, and I who deal with Win32 regularly all feel *.conf is more logical than *.txt. I have not heard anyone say *.txt is better except Tom. Is that enough of a vote? *ahem* :-) I though what I said was that we should leave the name alone except

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: My feeling is that the *.txt is actually misleading because people will think of it as a file full of freeform text (paragraphs) and not a configuration file. Why would they think that? If notepad tends to auto-wrap files then this argument has some force; I'm

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: [.][..] 1138945.s 1138945.w abook.mab bookmarks-1.html bookmarks-2.html bookmarks-3.html bookmarks-4.html bookmarks-5.html bookmarks-6.html bookmarks.html [Cache][Cache.Trash]

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: My feeling is that the *.txt is actually misleading because people will think of it as a file full of freeform text (paragraphs) and not a configuration file. Why would they think that? If notepad tends to auto-wrap files then this

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

2005-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom also wrote: Now that I look at it, there are several places that are depending on getenv(HOME) or getenv(USERPROFILE) (on Windows) as the meaning of home directory. In particular ~/.pgpass is sought there, and psql also uses get_home_path in a