Greg Stark wrote:
Shridhar Daithankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The little pthreads programming I did on linux/freeBSD tells me that it
supports majority of features except TLS(linux2.4/linuxthreads) and per thread
signals.
LinuxThreads is dead. NPTL is the way and the light.
It has ELF TLS
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 13:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
SRA's Windows port is up to 7.3.4, and I think they just released
version 1.1, so that is going fine --- and I have the source code to
use in our native Win32 port, just not the threading stuff.
And if
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 13:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
SRA's Windows port is up to 7.3.4, and I think they just released
version 1.1, so that is going fine --- and I have the source code to
use in our native Win32 port, just not the threading
Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, I've been wondering lately if we'd not be better off to look at
using threading in the Windows port, if it'd help us get around the
fork/exec data transfer problem. I'm not sure that it would, mind you,
but if it would give an answer it might be a lot less painful than
Shridhar Daithankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Considering this could be a configure time option, you mean to say
that even on Unix we could get threaded postgresql which would not
require any shared buffers but instead operate upon local shared
buffers only?
Only if we were prepared to
Tom Lane wrote:
Shridhar Daithankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Considering this could be a configure time option, you mean to say
that even on Unix we could get threaded postgresql which would not
require any shared buffers but instead operate upon local shared
buffers only?
Only if we were
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shridhar Daithankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Considering this could be a configure time option, you mean to say
that even on Unix we could get threaded postgresql which would not
require any shared buffers but instead operate upon local shared
buffers
Shridhar Daithankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The little pthreads programming I did on linux/freeBSD tells me that it
supports majority of features except TLS(linux2.4/linuxthreads) and per thread
signals.
LinuxThreads is dead. NPTL is the way and the light.
It has ELF TLS which for
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 01:18 am, Greg Stark wrote:
Well if you're only going to do one threading API you may as well pick the
POSIX standard. Windows threading is only useful for windows, POSIX
threading would work on every other OS, Solaris, Linux, BSD, etc.
Is there a POSIX threads wrapper for
