Re: [HACKERS] [w32] test_shm_mq test suite permanently burns connections slots

2014-07-30 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Robert Haas wrote: OK, I think I see the problem. In EXEC_BACKEND mode, SubPostmasterMain() calls InitProcess() before IsBackgroundWorker has been set. InitProcess() therefore pulls the PGPROC for the worker

Re: [HACKERS] [w32] test_shm_mq test suite permanently burns connections slots

2014-07-28 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: On a Windows or other EXEC_BACKEND build, the following eventually gets failures because all, or all but one, max_connections slot is consumed: for run in `seq 1 100`; do make -C contrib/test_shm_mq installcheck; done

Re: [HACKERS] [w32] test_shm_mq test suite permanently burns connections slots

2014-07-28 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: On a Windows or other EXEC_BACKEND build, the following eventually gets failures because all, or all but one, max_connections slot is consumed: for

Re: [HACKERS] [w32] test_shm_mq test suite permanently burns connections slots

2014-07-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote: OK, I think I see the problem. In EXEC_BACKEND mode, SubPostmasterMain() calls InitProcess() before IsBackgroundWorker has been set. InitProcess() therefore pulls the PGPROC for the worker from freeProcs rather than bgworkerFreeProcs. By exit time, IsBackgroundWorker

[HACKERS] [w32] test_shm_mq test suite permanently burns connections slots

2014-07-25 Thread Noah Misch
On a Windows or other EXEC_BACKEND build, the following eventually gets failures because all, or all but one, max_connections slot is consumed: for run in `seq 1 100`; do make -C contrib/test_shm_mq installcheck; done When I use max_connections=40, it fails on the sixth iteration. Only the