Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:36, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On tor, 2011-06-09 at 16:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Based on this list, a global exclude for *.exe and lib*dll.def seems reasonable. We already have finer-grained excludes for various lib*dll.def variations in the

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2011-06-09 at 16:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Based on this list, a global exclude for *.exe and lib*dll.def seems reasonable. We already have finer-grained excludes for various lib*dll.def variations in the libpq and ecpg subdirectories. Those should be cleaned up if we are adding

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw? I know msvc builds out-of-tree, but mingw

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Radosław Smogura
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 06/09/2011 08:12 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogurarsmog...@softperience.eu wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw?

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Radosław Smogura
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
=?UTF-8?Q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= rsmog...@softperience.eu writes: On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: What's nbproject? Just configuration from some editor. It looks like any move in project creates this entry in .gitignore If you've got random third-party tools

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:40, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote: On 06/09/2011 08:12 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogurarsmog...@softperience.eu  wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:40, Radosław Smogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 06/09/2011 10:25 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Based on this list, a global exclude for *.exe and lib*dll.def seems reasonable. Andrew, does that seem right to you as well? That plus an entry in src/backend/.gitignore for /postgres.def. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Radosław Smogura
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net Thursday 09 of June 2011 16:25:07 On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:40, Radosław Smogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:40, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote: On 06/09/2011 10:25 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Based on this list, a global exclude for *.exe and lib*dll.def seems reasonable. Andrew, does that seem right to you as well? That plus an entry in src/backend/.gitignore

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 09 09:42:02 -0400 2011: =?UTF-8?Q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= rsmog...@softperience.eu writes: On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: What's nbproject? Just configuration from some editor. It looks like any move in project

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes: I agree with that, though the *dll.def files are ours and probably deserve a global .gitignore entry. Agreed, and that's done. As for executables, I think the local .gitignore files in each subdir should be tweaked so that they catch the .exe

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 09 12:57:46 -0400 2011: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes: I agree with that, though the *dll.def files are ours and probably deserve a global .gitignore entry. Agreed, and that's done. Oh, I see ... I haven't gotten the commit

[HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-08 Thread Radosław Smogura
After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Regards, Radekdiff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index 81c4d5e..75e1d9a --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -20,6 +20,14 @@ lcov.info *.vcproj