Re: [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-10-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added this to backend/libpq/README.SSL to be integrated into our main docs later. --- Bear Giles wrote: A second cut at SSL documentation SSL Support in PostgreSQL = Who needs

Re: [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-05-22 Thread Nigel J. Andrews
On Tue, 21 May 2002 14:27:00 -0600 (MDT) Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A second cut at SSL documentation [snip] To set up a SSH/OpenSSH tunnel, a shell account for each user should be set up on the database server. It is acceptable for the shell program to be bogus (e.g.,

[HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-05-21 Thread Bear Giles
A second cut at SSL documentation SSL Support in PostgreSQL = Who needs it? = The sites that require SSL fall into one (or more) of several broad categories. *) They have insecure networks. Examples of insecure networks are anyone in a corporate

Re: [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-05-21 Thread Neil Conway
On Tue, 21 May 2002 14:27:00 -0600 (MDT) Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A second cut at SSL documentation I've pointed out some minor things I noticed while reading through. Yeah, I was bored :-) The sites that require SSL fall into one (or more) of several broad categories. *)