You should find that the next daily snapshot and beta3 will properly
detect Opteron/Itanium on your platform.
I don't think we can help you with the compiler bugs, however. ;-)
---
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
-On
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
-On [20030905 20:52], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Alternatively, find out what symbols your compiler predeclares.
If my theory is right then your pg_config_os.h file is failing to
define HAS_TEST_AND_SET; why?
Indeed, pg_config_os.h does not set
Hello,
I'm a beginner here at the list, my name is Daniel Pellegrini, graduation
student from Brazil with no experience about pgsql. First of all I'd like to
say that I have tried other lists before, but I didn't get the answer, or
the complete answer.
I'm doing a research about DBMSs that run
I'm doing a research about DBMSs that run on new PC 64-bit processors, like
Intel Itanium and AMD Opteron. I'd like that you would help me in some
questions. First, does pgsql support this architecture? According to
Administrator's
-On [20030905 16:42], Rod Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Download 7.4 beta 2 and run regression tests on those platforms. Report
back any issues or successes. 7.4 Release candidates will come with a
call for reports on platforms that pass the regression tests which are
used to make up the
-On [20030905 17:22], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, on Itanium2 on FreeBSD 5.1 it compiles. I just need to get the
semaphores to a higher value in order to actually do an initdb.
Though,
did 7.4 raise the bar on SysV IPC? On my other two boxes I haven't
tweaked SysV
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 11:29, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
-On [20030905 17:22], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, on Itanium2 on FreeBSD 5.1 it compiles. I just need to get the
semaphores to a higher value in order to actually do an initdb.
Though,
did 7.4 raise
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
did 7.4 raise the bar on SysV IPC? On my other two boxes I haven't
tweaked SysV IPC at all (semmni is at 10) and I get initdb.
Is this beta 1 or beta 2? Beta 1 has a bug which may require more
shared resources than what is available.
Actually the bug is
-On [20030905 17:42], Rod Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is this beta 1 or beta 2? Beta 1 has a bug which may require more
shared resources than what is available.
Sorry, beta 2. Should've made that clear.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmodai(at)wxs.nl / asmodai
PGP fingerprint: 2D92
-On [20030905 17:52], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Actually the bug is in beta2, not beta1. I'd suggest grabbing the
current nightly snapshot (see /dev on the ftp servers) in preference
to beta2, if you are on a machine with small SysV IPC limits.
Using a snapshot of September the 4th:
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using a snapshot of September the 4th:
creating template1 database in /p/scratch/asmodai/postgresql-snapshot/src/test/r
egress/./tmp_check/data/base/1... FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space
left on device
DETAIL: Failed syscall was
-On [20030905 18:32], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If it dies even at max_connections 10, that is a *lower* setting than we
ever supported before (the pre-7.4 default was 32, and you need 20 or
more to run the parallel regression test). I suspect that you actually
don't have SysV
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So it does seem 7.4 places higher demand than 7.3.4 on the SysV IPC,
It should not; there is something wrong here, not merely a documentation
problem. I am wondering whether your 7.4 build fails to select a TAS()
implementation --- if so, it
-On [20030905 20:52], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Alternatively, find out what symbols your compiler predeclares.
If my theory is right then your pg_config_os.h file is failing to
define HAS_TEST_AND_SET; why?
Indeed, pg_config_os.h does not set anything for __ia64__.
When I added
-On [20030905 19:12], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It should not; there is something wrong here, not merely a documentation
problem. I am wondering whether your 7.4 build fails to select a TAS()
implementation --- if so, it would fall back to implementing spinlocks
as semaphores, which
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I guess the problem lies in the Itanium port. Or could I miss
something subtle here?
This strengthens my suspicion that we're not finding TAS code for
the Itanium, but please see if you can strace or ktrace the postmaster
to verify how many
Tom Lane wrote:
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I guess the problem lies in the Itanium port. Or could I miss
something subtle here?
This strengthens my suspicion that we're not finding TAS code for
the Itanium, but please see if you can strace or ktrace the
17 matches
Mail list logo
