David E. Wheeler wrote:
This code:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo() returns boolean as $$
DECLARE
have_rec record;
want_rec record;
BEGIN
have_rec := row(1, 2);
want_rec := row(3, 5);
RETURN have_rec IS DISTINCT FROM want_rec;
On Jul 7, 2009, at 12:49 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Is this a known issue in 8.3? If so, is there a known workaround?
The change is probably here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-10/msg00110.php
So I think it is safe to argue that this is not a bug in 8.3, but an
This code:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo() returns boolean as $$
DECLARE
have_rec record;
want_rec record;
BEGIN
have_rec := row(1, 2);
want_rec := row(3, 5);
RETURN have_rec IS DISTINCT FROM want_rec;
END;
$$ language plpgsql;
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:35 PM, David E. Wheelerda...@kineticode.com wrote:
This code:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo() returns boolean as $$
DECLARE
have_rec record;
want_rec record;
BEGIN
have_rec := row(1, 2);
want_rec := row(3, 5);
RETURN
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Merlin Moncuremmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:35 PM, David E. Wheelerda...@kineticode.com wrote:
This code:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo() returns boolean as $$
DECLARE
have_rec record;
want_rec record;
BEGIN
On Jul 1, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
fyi: works in 8.4, as part of a broad fix of composite type
comparison ops
whoops, you knew that already :-). one possible workaround is:
select $1::text is distinct from $2::text
Yes, and that's what I'm doing, although it is
