Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-21 Thread Jeff Janes
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.comwrote: MauMau escribió: From: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
MauMau escribió: From: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I understanding the meaning of fixup patch? Yep, thanks. Please use the attached patch.

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-04 Thread MauMau
From: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I understanding the meaning of fixup patch? Yep, thanks. Please use the attached patch. Thanks. Regards MauMau

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-03 Thread MauMau
From: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I understanding the meaning of fixup patch? Regards MauMau -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
MauMau escribió: From: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I understanding the meaning of fixup patch? Yep, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
MauMau escribió: AbortStartTime 0 is also necessary to avoid sending SIGKILL repeatedly. I sent the attached patch during the original discussion. The below fragment is relevant: Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? -- Álvaro Herrera

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-13 Thread MauMau
From: Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com -- I've implemented the Min to Max change and did some more testing. Now I have a different but related problem (which I also saw before, but less often than the select() one). The 5 second clock doesn't get

[HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-12 Thread Jeff Janes
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Noah Misch escribió: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: I think the problem is here, where there should be a Max rather than a Min: commit 82233ce7ea42d6ba519aaec63008aff49da6c7af Author: Alvaro

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-11 Thread Noah Misch
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: I've been getting some failures after an immediate shutdown or crash, during severe IO stress, with the message: LOG: XX000: select() failed in postmaster: Invalid argument LOCATION: ServerLoop, postmaster.c:1560 It is trying

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Noah Misch escribió: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: I think the problem is here, where there should be a Max rather than a Min: commit 82233ce7ea42d6ba519aaec63008aff49da6c7af Author: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org Date: Fri Jun 28 17:20:53 2013

[HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-10 Thread Jeff Janes
I've been getting some failures after an immediate shutdown or crash, during severe IO stress, with the message: LOG: XX000: select() failed in postmaster: Invalid argument LOCATION: ServerLoop, postmaster.c:1560 It is trying to sleep for -1 seconds. I think the problem is here, where there