Re: [HACKERS] 9.6 Feature help requested: Inclusion Constraints

2015-02-11 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:47:22PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 2/9/15 3:12 AM, Jeff Davis wrote: On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 16:08 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: I believe Inclusion Constraints will be important for postgres. I forgot to credit Darren Duncan with the name of this feature:

Re: [HACKERS] 9.6 Feature help requested: Inclusion Constraints

2015-02-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2/9/15 3:12 AM, Jeff Davis wrote: On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 16:08 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: I believe Inclusion Constraints will be important for postgres. I forgot to credit Darren Duncan with the name of this feature: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4f8bb9b0.5090...@darrenduncan.net

Re: [HACKERS] 9.6 Feature help requested: Inclusion Constraints

2015-02-09 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 16:08 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: I believe Inclusion Constraints will be important for postgres. I forgot to credit Darren Duncan with the name of this feature: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4f8bb9b0.5090...@darrenduncan.net Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent

[HACKERS] 9.6 Feature help requested: Inclusion Constraints

2015-02-07 Thread Jeff Davis
I believe Inclusion Constraints will be important for postgres. Unfortunately, my time has been scarce lately, so without help it may miss 9.6 as well. If someone is interested in working on this with me to deliver a good submission in a couple months, please let me know. The idea is to make a