Re: [HACKERS] A portable code question

2003-06-26 Thread Andrew Dunstan
l Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:20 PM >> To: pgsql hackers list >> Subject: [HACKERS] A portable code question >> >> >> In the little fix I came up w

Re: [HACKERS] A portable code question

2003-06-26 Thread nolan
> Assuming you're using file streams to write to the pipe, fflush() will do > the trick. The problem is that the pipe (from \o |tee ) is intermingling writes to stdout by tee with direct writes to stdout from within psql. I do issue a fflush, because that's necessary to make the pipe do its

Re: [HACKERS] A portable code question

2003-06-26 Thread Benjamin Minshall
Assuming you're using file streams to write to the pipe, fflush() will do the trick. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:20 PM > To: pgsql hackers list > Sub

[HACKERS] A portable code question

2003-06-26 Thread nolan
In the little fix I came up with for psql last night, I need to be able to ensure that something sent to a pipe (and then to stdout) completes before issuing the prompt directly to stdout. I did this with: "system ('sleep 1');", but I'm fairly sure that is not portable nor does it ENSURE compl