Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> Masaru Sugawara wrote:
> > The previous patch fixed an infinite recursion bug in
> > contrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.c:connectby. But, other unmanageable error
> > seems to occu
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> Masaru Sugawara wrote:
> >
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:32:08 -0700
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Masaru Sugawara wrote:
> > The previous patch fixed an infinite recursion bug in
> > contrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.c:connectby. But, other unmanageable error
> > seems to occur even if a table has commonplace tree data(see
Masaru Sugawara wrote:
> The previous patch fixed an infinite recursion bug in
> contrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.c:connectby. But, other unmanageable error
> seems to occur even if a table has commonplace tree data(see below).
>
> I would think the patch, ancestor check, should be
>
> if (strstr(
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 02:02:49 +0900
I wrote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Sep 2002 10:21:21 -0700
> Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just sent in a patch using the ancestor check method. It turned out
> > that the performance hit was pretty small on a moderate sized tree.
On Sat, 07 Sep 2002 10:21:21 -0700
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just sent in a patch using the ancestor check method. It turned out
> that the performance hit was pretty small on a moderate sized tree.
>
> My test case was a 22 record bill-of-material table. The tree built
> w
