Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Think about what "open source" means. It doesn't mean that we give our
> users binary blobs compiled on some guy's machine, because it's too
> inconvenient to obtain the build tools. If it's too inconvenient to
> obtain build tools, you use a bina
>> The discussion back when it was decided weighted things back and
>> forth. The main thing is that we'd include an extra build dependency
>> for win32, which would be the Microsoft toolkit, several hundred Mb
>> to download just to build a 32 byte file.
>
>Think about what "open source" means. I
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The discussion back when it was decided weighted things back and
> forth. The main thing is that we'd include an extra build dependency
> for win32, which would be the Microsoft toolkit, several hundred Mb
> to download just to build a 32 byte file.
Think about what "open
>If pgevent is a DLL, why is it in src/bin?
>
>We cannot have binary files like MSG1.bin in our source tree, no
>matter how convenient it is. The distributors are going to
>kill us for
>that. Please find another way.
The discussion back when it was decided weighted things back and forth.
If pgevent is a DLL, why is it in src/bin?
We cannot have binary files like MSG1.bin in our source tree, no
matter how convenient it is. The distributors are going to kill us for
that. Please find another way.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---
