On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since commit 5d93ce2d, the output of xmllint is checked by passing
>> --valid to it. Isn't that a regression with what we were doing for
>> pre-9.4 versions? For example, with 9.4 and older versions it
Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since commit 5d93ce2d, the output of xmllint is checked by passing
> --valid to it. Isn't that a regression with what we were doing for
> pre-9.4 versions? For example, with 9.4 and older versions it is
> possible to compile man pages even if the xml spec is no
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Since commit 5d93ce2d, the output of xmllint is checked by passing
> --valid to it. Isn't that a regression with what we were doing for
> pre-9.4 versions? For example, with 9.4 and older versions it is
> possible to compile man pages even
Hi all,
Since commit 5d93ce2d, the output of xmllint is checked by passing
--valid to it. Isn't that a regression with what we were doing for
pre-9.4 versions? For example, with 9.4 and older versions it is
possible to compile man pages even if the xml spec is not entirely
valid when using docbook
