Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Have you removed the existing stats-gathering support
>> (backend/access/heap/stats.c and so on)? That would buy back
>> at least a few of the cycles involved ...
> Not sure if we really should. Let's later decide if it's
>
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So outing myself not beeing a *real programmer*, this is what
> I have so far:
Hmm ... what is the performance of all this like? Seems like a lot
of overhead. Can it be turned off?
> * Backends call some collector functions at various plac
> One more feature for discussion :-)
>
> In the next couple of hours (at least tomorrow) I would be
> ready to commit the backend changes for table-/index-access
> statistics and current backend activity views.
>
> Should I apply the patches or provide a separate patch f
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the next couple of hours (at least tomorrow) I would be
> ready to commit the backend changes for table-/index-access
> statistics and current backend activity views.
> Should I apply the patches or provide a separate patch for
>
