Re: [HACKERS] AclId is defined in the wrong place

2003-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No problem, go ahead. I put it there only because I needed it for some > of the prototypes, and I didn't want to be so bold as to move it even > farther up into the include system, Properly so --- but if the consequence is to have to include miscadmin.h

Re: [HACKERS] AclId is defined in the wrong place

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > I'd like to move the typedef for AclId out of miscadmin.h, where it was > originally placed, and into postgres.h or c.h where most other fundamental > typedefs appear. As is, we've got a problem with miscadmin.h having > to be included into many header files where it doesn't belo

[HACKERS] AclId is defined in the wrong place

2003-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
I'd like to move the typedef for AclId out of miscadmin.h, where it was originally placed, and into postgres.h or c.h where most other fundamental typedefs appear. As is, we've got a problem with miscadmin.h having to be included into many header files where it doesn't belong, and that problem is