On 2014-07-02 08:55:05 +, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
Also can we change the description of function pg_buffercache_pages to
include pinning_backend also in the description.
I'm not sure what you mean here - I've adjusted the docs to include the
column? Or do you mean that it errorneously was
On 23 June 2014 15:22, Andres Freund Wrote:
This may be harmless but pinning_backends should be defined as int4
rather than int8 because BufferDesc-refcount is just defined as
unsigned and it's converted to Datum by Int32GetDatum().
Well, in theory a uint32 can't generally be converted
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
buffers pinned. Once during development and once while analyzing a stuck
vacuum (waiting for a cleanup lock).
I'd like to add a column to
On 2014-06-23 18:44:24 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
buffers pinned. Once during development and once while analyzing a stuck
vacuum (waiting
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-06-23 18:44:24 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Hi,
The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
buffers
Hi,
The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
buffers pinned. Once during development and once while analyzing a stuck
vacuum (waiting for a cleanup lock).
I'd like to add a column to pg_buffercache exposing that. The name I've
come up with is 'pinning_backends' to
