On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Is this a TODO?
Sounds good to me.
It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
\ev.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Is this a TODO?
Sounds good to me.
I think it would be useful if we put line breaks in the column list it
gets, otherwise not so much for any view with more than a handful of
columns.
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Is this a TODO?
Sounds good to me.
I think it would be useful if we put line breaks in the column list it
gets, otherwise not so much for any view
Is this a TODO?
---
Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
\ev. While editors would also be good for other
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:26:05PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
andrew=# select pg_get_viewdef('foo',true);
pg_get_viewdef
--
SELECT 'a'::text AS b,
( SELECT 1
FROM dual) AS x,
random() AS y,
Tom Lane wrote:
It might be worth pointing out that what I don't want pg_dump doing
is suppressing useless parentheses. Adding whitespace ought to be
safe enough. So if anyone wanted to do the work of decoupling those
two effects of the prettyprint option, we could have semi pretty
printed
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It might be worth pointing out that what I don't want pg_dump doing
is suppressing useless parentheses. Adding whitespace ought to be
safe enough. So if anyone wanted to do the work of decoupling those
two effects of the prettyprint
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It might be worth pointing out that what I don't want pg_dump doing
is suppressing useless parentheses. Adding whitespace ought to be
safe enough. So if anyone wanted to do the work of decoupling those
two
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
That's not what I had in mind by decoupling the option's effects.
Well, regardless of that it does what I want, and with a fairly small
amount of code.
Well, yeah, because you are paying no mind to what anyone else might
want.
I
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
That's not what I had in mind by decoupling the option's effects.
Well, regardless of that it does what I want, and with a fairly small
amount of code.
Well, yeah, because you are paying no
Hi,
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tis, 2009-09-01 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Opinions? Other objects which could take \e?
All of them.
Well, I'd vote against \e table. Are you going to propose the CREATE
TABLE statement and have magics to produce the ALTER TABLE that
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
All,
I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
\ev. While editors would also be good for other objects, I don't think
we can do \et or \er etc.
On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:07 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
One reason I don't like this proposal is that postgresql does not
preserve the original 'create view' statement for editing. The
resulting sql that is given to you to edit is hopelessly mangled and I
think it's not good to encourage people to
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:07 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
One reason I don't like this proposal is that postgresql does not
preserve the original 'create view' statement for editing. The
resulting sql that is given to you to edit is hopelessly mangled and I
think it's not
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
David E. Wheeler wrote:
Is there any reason that the CREATE VIEW output to pg_dump and,
presumably, \ev, couldn't be refactored to pretty-print the VIEW
declaration?
Tom just said a day or two ago that he doesn't want pg_dump using any
pretty
All,
I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
\ev. While editors would also be good for other objects, I don't think
we can do \et or \er etc. because those objects don't support CREATE OR
REPLACE.
Opinions? Other
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:41:31AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
\ev. While editors would also be good for other objects, I don't think
we can do \et or \er etc.
Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
\ev. While editors would also be good for other objects, I don't think
we can do \et or \er etc. because those objects don't support CREATE OR
On tis, 2009-09-01 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Opinions? Other objects which could take \e?
All of them.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
19 matches
Mail list logo
