Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-22 Thread Josh Berkus
All: Sounds like the overwhemling consensus is Alpha2 then. Will run with it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hacke

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2015/07/22 12:40, Noah Misch wrote: >> I vote for alpha2. Comparing the "Open Issues" and "resolved after >> 9.5alpha1" >> sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, >> we've >> not transitioned to a qualitati

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2015/07/22 12:40, Noah Misch wrote: I vote for alpha2. Comparing the "Open Issues" and "resolved after 9.5alpha1" sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability. +1 for alpha2. I'd like to p

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Simon Riggs
On 21 July 2015 at 22:01, Josh Berkus wrote: > My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? > Alpha2 -- Simon Riggshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Noah Misch wrote: > I vote for alpha2. Comparing the "Open Issues" and "resolved after 9.5alpha1" > sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've > not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability. I agree. I'd

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Noah Misch wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta >> each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a >> 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Noah Misch
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta > each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a > 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August. > > My question for Hackers is: should this b

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Gavin Flower
On 22/07/15 09:01, Josh Berkus wrote: [...] My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? Yes! :-) (The decision, as to which, I'll leave to the REAL Developers.) More seriously, I expect that the alpha probably generated a lot of useful feedback. Was this actually the cas

[HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Josh Berkus
All: At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August. My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http