Re: [HACKERS] Autoanalyze of the autovacuum daemon ...

2012-11-01 Thread Mark Kirkwood
On 01/11/12 00:25, Baptiste LHOSTE wrote: Hi All, We are using postgreSQL since 2007 (now we use postgreSQL 8.4) and until recently we used to perform vacuum and analyze tasks by ourself. Nevertheless we reached a point where these tasks are taking so much time that why we decide to use the

[HACKERS] Autoanalyze of the autovacuum daemon ...

2012-11-01 Thread Baptiste LHOSTE
Hi All, We are using postgreSQL since 2007 (now we use postgreSQL 8.4) and until recently we used to perform vacuum and analyze tasks by ourself. Nevertheless we reached a point where these tasks are taking so much time that why we decide to use the autovacuum daemon. But we have some

[HACKERS] Autoanalyze of the autovacuum daemon ...

2012-10-31 Thread Baptiste LHOSTE
Hi All, We are using postgreSQL since 2007 (now we use postgreSQL 8.4) and until recently we used to perform vacuum and analyze tasks by ourself. Nevertheless we reached a point where these tasks are taking so much time that why we decide to use the autovacuum daemon. But we have some

Re: [HACKERS] Autoanalyze of the autovacuum daemon ...

2012-10-31 Thread Cédric Villemain
Hello this list is for PostgreSQL development purpose, better try at psql-general or -admin. But the autoanalyze is not that effective for second kind. if it is not running at all it is very probably because of threshold + scale_factor and the size of the second kind of tables. We tried to