Hi,
On Thursday 07 April 2011 18:10:35 Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't currently have a need to fix this before 8.4, and it looks like
> the existing patch doesn't apply easily to 8.3 anyway. So I'm only
> proposing to do this in 8.4.
> Comments, objections?
I personally look forward to that as it has
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm getting some pressure at Red Hat to back-patch this fix:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-08/msg00068.php
> (commit dcb2bda9b7042dbf43f876c94ebf35d951de10e9)
> into the RHEL 8.4.x postgresql release. Since I have to do t
I'm getting some pressure at Red Hat to back-patch this fix:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-08/msg00068.php
(commit dcb2bda9b7042dbf43f876c94ebf35d951de10e9)
into the RHEL 8.4.x postgresql release. Since I have to do the work
anyway, it seems to me to be sensible to commit th
