Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:42:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
VACUUM vacuums all tables.
In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone do the same thing.
And what about REINDEX? That seems to have a different syntax from the
other two.
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone do the same thing.
I agree, lose the ALL.
And what about
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:42:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I'm planning to do the freelist thing, then the btree
compaction and then replace the current REINDEX code with the compaction
code, probably including some means to do
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone do the same thing.
I agree, lose the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:43:38PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And what about REINDEX? That seems to have a different syntax from the
other two. Seems there should be some consistency.
We don't have a REINDEX ALL, and I'm not
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I don't understand is what are the parameters in the
ReindexDatabase function for. For example, the boolean all is always
false in tcop/utility.c (and there are no other places that the function
is called). Also, the database name is checked to
In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone do the same thing.
And what about REINDEX? That seems to have a different syntax from the
other
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:43:38PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And what about REINDEX? That seems to have a different
syntax from the other two. Seems there should be some
10 matches
Mail list logo