On Friday 22 August 2008 22:25:08 Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter, have you completed this yet?
yes
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
I propose that we relax these two
Peter, have you completed this yet?
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
I propose that we relax these two checks to test for binary-coercibility
instead, which is effectively
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
I propose that we relax these two checks to test for binary-coercibility
instead, which is effectively what is expected and required here anyway.
Here is the corresponding patch.
diff -ur ../cvs-pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_cast.sgml
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
I propose that we relax these two checks to test for binary-coercibility
instead, which is effectively what is expected and required here anyway.
Here is the corresponding patch.
Looks good, but
I noticed that some of the entries in pg_cast are shaped in a way that CREATE
CAST wouldn't let pass. For example, the cast from cidr to varchar is
effectively defined as
CREATE CAST (cidr AS varchar) WITH FUNCTION text(inet) AS ASSIGNMENT;
but CREATE CAST wouldn't allow this because the
