On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Apparently there's something wrong with 'test-decoding-check':
Man. I shouldn't have asked... My code. There's some output in there
that's probably triggered by the extraordinarily long
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
My gut feeling says it's in RelationGetIndexList().
Nearly right. It's in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap(). Fix attached.
TBH, I don't believe this patch at all. Where exactly is rd_replidindex
reset?
On 2014-05-14 12:15:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
My gut feeling says it's in RelationGetIndexList().
Nearly right. It's in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap(). Fix attached.
TBH, I don't believe this
On 2014-05-14 13:32:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-05-14 12:15:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
And why does the header
comment for RelationGetIndexList make no mention of this new side-effect?
Somebody did a seriously poor job of adding this
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-05-14 12:15:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
And why does the header
comment for RelationGetIndexList make no mention of this new side-effect?
Somebody did a seriously poor job of adding this functionality to
relcache.
It's not like it's not
On 14.5.2014 17:52, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Apparently there's something wrong with 'test-decoding-check':
Man. I shouldn't have asked... My code. There's some output in there
that's probably
Hi,
On 2014-05-14 21:04:41 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 14.5.2014 17:52, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Apparently there's something wrong with 'test-decoding-check':
Man. I shouldn't have
On 14.5.2014 22:29, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-05-14 21:04:41 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 14.5.2014 17:52, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:17:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Apparently there's something wrong with
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
On 14.5.2014 22:29, Andres Freund wrote:
I'm afraid it's more in the year range from what i've seen. I.e. not
practical.
Yeah, that wouldn't be very practical. I'll try to run it though and if
it'd run more than a few days, I'll switch it to
