Has there been anything controversial? What was causing it to take so long.
I have time to work on it now
On 9 Mar 2015 17:06, Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
In the light of Tom's comment in 22996.1425919...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Tom I will admit that I'm been slacking on
On 2015-03-09 17:17:14 +, Greg Stark wrote:
Has there been anything controversial? What was causing it to take so long.
I have time to work on it now
If you want to, you probably need to read the relevant thread.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
Greg == Greg Stark st...@mit.edu writes:
Greg Has there been anything controversial?
The major controversy is the idea of processing multiple sort orderings
using a stacked chain of aggregate and sort nodes. I'll follow up
shortly with links or a summary of the most significant criticisms; but
In the light of Tom's comment in 22996.1425919...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Tom I will admit that I'm been slacking on commitfest work. This is
Tom not unrelated to the fact that we've been in commitfest mode
Tom continuously since last August. I'm afraid whatever enthusiasm I
Tom had for reviewing
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
In the light of Tom's comment in 22996.1425919...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Tom I will admit that I'm been slacking on commitfest work. This is
Tom not unrelated to the fact that we've been in commitfest mode
Tom continuously since last August. I'm
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I'm now requesting that some other committer take on the grouping
sets patch. Any takers?
Tom FWIW, slacking doesn't mean I've abandoned Postgres work
Tom completely.
I had taken your name off the patch in the CF and was planning to post
this
