"Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Something that just occurred to me: should the documentation tree still
> contain full documentation for the various client interfaces, now that
> they have been unbundled?
No, and it doesn't AFAICS ... only the still-bundled client libs are
ment
Something that just occurred to me: should the documentation tree still
contain full documentation for the various client interfaces, now that
they have been unbundled?
If so, I'd very much like to see the part about libpq++ being "the" C++
interface changed to mention libpqxx as a replacement.
