Hi all,
> > The ability to comment on all types of catalog objects or actual
> > comments on all predefined catalog objects? Both are more or less
> > reasonable. But I think we should have some sort of
> > internationalization mechanism for the actual comments.
>
> One of my first commits f
> Bulk? Redundancy with the SGML documentation?
>
> There are already more than enough places to have to edit documentation
> when we change/add a column in a system catalog. I don't see the value
> of adding another, especially not one that's constrained to one line.
> And what will comments on
The ability to comment on all types of catalog objects or actual
comments on all predefined catalog objects? Both are more or less
reasonable. But I think we should have some sort of
internationalization mechanism for the actual comments.
One of my first commits for 7.5 was the format, I added
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Is there any reason I shouldn't submit a patch that makes it so that
> we have comments on 100% of the catalog objects?
The ability to comment on all types of catalog objects or actual
comments on all predefined catalog objects? Both are more or less
reasonable.
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any reason I shouldn't submit a patch that makes it so that we
> have comments on 100% of the catalog objects?
Bulk? Redundancy with the SGML documentation?
There are already more than enough places to have to edit documentation
whe
Hi,
Is there any reason I shouldn't submit a patch that makes it so that we
have comments on 100% of the catalog objects? I don't see any reason
why we shouldn't do it...
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
